‘A particle is a localized excitation of a field, whereas a field is a continuous entity that represents something at every point (such as a force).’

As well as being and becoming and the nature of matter in time Ive been thinking about thoughts, their behaviour, origins, nature…

When I’m not studying or working my subjective thought beam isn’t focussed on an object so the beam becomes unfocused and diffuse but thoughts continue to happen often unbidden, unwanted, over-familiar and detrimental.

They can seem to appear almost from both an internal and external source – they involve my memories but with a kind of third party voice – hence ‘they’..

And suddenly I have become the object of thoughts subjective action – i am the third party

The observer

This type of thought can ping into existence like a proton emerging from a field of potential

And the subject and object intertwine and whirl around each other exchanging energy from order to disorder

Yes i know

I’m using pseudo scientific language – a language that is itself already metaphorical as it seeks to extract Magic from Technic

But in a post-mod era where language itself reflects our uncertainty…

“…i was like thinking about like I don’t know, like kind of thinking about like kind of thinking…” is, it seems, an acceptable sentence in contemporary speech…

..then ill use whatever is to hand.

There isn’t a future tense in English. We use intention – I will visit the mountain, I am going to see the film.

That’s because language evolved as part of our evolutionary experience in partnership with the senses. But now its lagging behind.

What are the words that describe the position of the flower tomorrow in relation to today?